Tax Exemption for Residents of Former Tribal Areas: Court Decision

Table of Contents

1. Introduction
2. Background of the Case
3. Key Legal Provisions
4. Petitioner’s Arguments
5. Legal Analysis
6. Court’s Findings
7. Conclusion
8. Contact Muhammad Amin

---

1. Introduction

In the case of Messrs Sardar Wali Khan Carriage Contractor vs. Government of Pakistan, the petitioner challenged the income tax and withholding tax demands for services provided in the former Tribal Areas, now part of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KP). The petitioner requested tax exemptions under the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001.

2. Background of the Case

The petitioner, a government contractor, runs a business in Chitral, an area previously part of FATA and PATA. He was awarded a contract for transporting wheat for the Food Department. However, the petitioner faced tax demands that he believed were unjust, as he resided and operated his business in the former Tribal Areas, which were exempt from tax under specific regulations.

3. Key Legal Provisions

• SRO 1213(I)/2018: This order, issued on 05.10.2018, grants tax exemptions to service providers from the former Tribal Areas under certain conditions.
• Income Tax Ordinance, 2001: Sections 148 and 159 are relevant, particularly in determining the exemption and whether the petitioner needs to provide an exemption certificate.

4. Petitioner’s Arguments

The petitioner made the following points:

1. His business, located in Chitral, should be exempt from income tax as he operates within the former Tribal Areas.
2. He provides services within PATA, making him eligible for tax exemption.
3. The law does not require him to provide an exemption certificate under Section 159 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, since the exemption applies automatically.

5. Legal Analysis

The court examined the law and the petitioner’s arguments:

• The exemption under SRO 1213(I)/2018 applies to service providers who are bona fide residents of the former Tribal Areas, with their businesses located there and their services consumed within these regions.
• The court found that the petitioner met all three conditions: he lived in the exempted area, his business operated there, and he provided services in that territory.
• The court also concluded that the tax authorities could not force the petitioner to obtain an exemption certificate under Section 159, as the law automatically grants the exemption.

6. Court’s Findings

The court ruled that:

1. The petitioner’s income from his business in the former Tribal Areas is exempt from income tax.
2. The petitioner does not need to provide an exemption certificate.
3. The government cannot collect taxes from the petitioner for services rendered within the exempted area.

7. Conclusion

The court sided with the petitioner and ruled that he was entitled to the tax exemptions. The court stated that the tax authorities could not demand taxes from him, and he did not need to submit an exemption certificate. Therefore, the petition was granted as requested.

8. Contact Muhammad Amin

If you need legal assistance or advice regarding tax exemptions or other legal matters, you can contact Muhammad Amin, Advocate.

Phone: 0313 9708019.