Supreme Court Denies Bail in Robbery and Murder Case

Table of Contents

1. Introduction
2. Case Background
3. Charges Against Kamran
4. Evidence Against Kamran
5. Court’s Decision
6. Legal Impact
7. Advocate Muhammad Amin – Legal Help
8. Conclusion

Introduction

The Supreme Court of Pakistan denied bail to Kamran in a robbery and murder case. The court found strong evidence against him and refused to grant bail.

Case Background

Kamran attacked Syed Nawazish Ali Shah with a dagger on January 27, 2023, in Mardan. The victim suffered serious injuries and died the next day. His family and police accused Kamran of the crime.

Charges Against Kamran

The police charged Kamran under:

• Section 392 PPC – Robbery
• Section 497 Cr.P.C – Bail restrictions for serious crimes

Before dying, the victim identified Kamran as his attacker in a police statement.

Evidence Against Kamran

The court considered the following evidence:

• Victim’s Statement: While in the hospital, the victim told the police that Kamran attacked him.
• CCTV Footage: The video showed Kamran stabbing the victim.
• Forensic Report: Experts confirmed that the video was real and unedited.
• Medical Report: Doctors reported fatal injuries to the victim’s liver and abdomen.
• Murder Weapon: Police found a dagger with human blood on it.

Court’s Decision

The Supreme Court refused bail, stating:

• Kamran committed a serious crime.
• The law does not allow bail in cases with strong evidence.
• CCTV footage and forensic reports confirmed Kamran’s involvement.
• Kamran’s young age did not give him a right to bail in a murder case.

Legal Impact

This decision shows that courts do not grant bail in serious cases. If the police present strong evidence like video proof and forensic reports, the court is unlikely to release the accused.

Advocate Muhammad Amin – Legal Help

If you need legal help for criminal cases, inheritance issues, or property disputes, contact:

Advocate Muhammad Amin
📞 Phone: 0313 9708019
📍 Office: Office No. 14, Zeb Plaza, University Road, Tahkal Payan

Conclusion

The Supreme Court’s ruling shows that the law takes serious crimes very strictly. When strong evidence exists, the court does not grant bail. This case highlights the importance of CCTV footage, medical reports, and forensic analysis in proving criminal charges.